WHO States Red/Processed Meat Linked to Cancer

Say No to Processed Meats

Once again the media outlets have been "rocked" by news on nutrition: the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that processed meat and red meat consumption are associated with cancer. In a press release dated October 26, 2015, the WHO stated that a group of 22 experts from ten countries reviewed the scientific literature and classified processed meat as "carcinogenic to humans" due to sufficient evidence that processed meats — like hot dogs, bacon, and salami — cause colorectal cancer. Red meat was classified as "probably carcinogenic to humans" and associated with pancreatic and prostate cancer as well as colorectal cancer.

The response to the WHO report from the plant-based community has been mixed, presumably because this information is not even slightly surprising to anyone who follows nutritional research. Many plant-based nutrition experts made no mention of the report on their blogs or Facebook pages in the immediate wake of the news. Others, like Forks Over Knives, PlantPure Nation, and Jeff Novick, MS, RD, simply reported the clear facts of the WHO press release without editorializing on the content. After all, the findings of the report speak for themselves.

Yet others in the community couldn't pass up the opportunity to reinforce the message that eating processed meats can kill us. Dr. Michael Greger noted on Facebook that "Processed meat is implicated in the deaths of more than 800,000 people annually overall." Dr. John McDougall's Facebook post was titled "The Dangers of Processed Meats - It's More Than Just Cancer" which was followed by a chart documenting risks of stroke, lung disease, heart disease, diabetes, and early death, as well as cancer of the bladder, prostate, and colon. Dr. Neal Barnard and PCRM put out a call for action: "Schools and hospitals are required to protect students and patients from cancer-causing asbestos. If WHO says processed meats are just as dangerous, it’s time to protect them from hot dogs and pepperoni, too." PCRM has invited the public to join their campaign at www.DropTheDog.org. The T. Colin Campbell Center for Nutritional Research remarked that the meat industries are "a bit upset" over the WHO report, but then asked, "Isn't it about time that everyone gets 'a bit upset' with the meat industries for feeding ‪#‎cancer‬?" And after stating that the average American eats about 18 pounds of bacon a year, VegSource pulled no punches: "Eating bacon or smoking cigarettes are choices people can make, but anyone giving their kids smokes or BLTs should probably receive parental education classes. Why have kids if you're not going to take care of them?" Julieanna Hever, the Plant-Based Dietician, simply gave this invitation: "Instead of eating meat and putting yourself at an increased risk for the world's biggest causes of death and disability, consider eating a health-promoting diet made of legumes, vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts, and seeds."

Reviewing the reactions of my colleagues to the WHO report, I applaud each one. The responses are varied because they reflect the needs of the varied sets of people we attempt to reach with our united message of hope and health through a whole-food plant-based diet. All of us agree; there is no need to eat meat. Habit, convenience, or family food traditions are not excuses to continue a legacy of disease and death for ourselves or our children. The earth is full of health-promoting foods, and there are plenty of interesting ways to prepare them. Increasing numbers of people are choosing to eat for life and vitality. While there are many options for support, I invite you to join the no-added-oil, whole-food plant-based community at DrCarney.com/club and discover the delicious freedom of eating "From Sun to Plant to Plate."

What do you think of the WHO report on red meat and processed meat? Please leave your comments below.

For additional information, click on the following links:

(1) What are the Consequences of Consuming Iron from Meat?

(2) Meat Consumption Linked to Cancer in 1907

(3) Dairy Products Promote Prostate Cancer

(4) Animal Fat Increases Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

(5) Red and Processed Meat Products: No Safe Amount

(6) Red and Processed Meat Products Linked to Mortality

(7) Harvard’s Meat and Mortality Studies

(8) Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption and All-Cause Mortality

(9) Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat

(10) Meat Consumption = High Risk of Disease

(11) Nitrites in Processed Meats Cause Cancer

(12) Linda Carney MD Cancer Pinterest Board

(13) Linda Carney MD articles and blogs on cancer

(14) Cancer is a Preventable Disease that Requires Major Lifestyle Changes

(15) American Cancer Society - World Health Organization Says Processed Meat Causes Cancer

(16) WHO Report

(17) Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat (The Lancet Oncology)

(18) Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition

(19) Red meat, chicken, and fish consumption and risk of colorectal cancer

(20) A Large Prospective Study of Meat Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk: An Investigation of Potential Mechanisms Underlying this Association

(21) A Central Role for Heme Iron in Colon Carcinogenesis Associated with Red Meat Intake

(22) Q and A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat

Preview the "Cancer Prevention & Women's Health" Trailer

Survive and Thrive: Which common (but seemingly unrelated) factors link many health problems together, including cancer and other women's health issues? Is cancer preventable? This DVD shows you which disease risks are worsened by excess estrogen, which you create in your body by choices in foods and beverages. Banish multiple health problems with the Starch-Smart® System.

Purchase as a Packaged DVD

Rent or Purchase as Streaming Media

Rate this blog entry:
Eat, Don't Toss Those Apple Peels!
South-of-the-Border Goodness!

Related Posts

 

People in this conversation

Comments (3)

Rated 5 out of 5 based on 1 votes
  1. Ken Thomas

From an engineering perspective, it is clear to me why meat and animal products promote cancer. Cancers are the result of cellular over-replication due to chronic cell damage (also known as inflammation).

It is well known that when someone receives an organ transplant, they must then take anti-rejection drugs that inhibit their immune system from attacking the foreign transplanted tissue. The immune system is genetically geared to recognize non-self animal tissues as foreign.

It is also known in the physics and engineering world that all processes incur loss. Nothing is 100% efficient. Thus, when digesting animal proteins, some do not get broken down into their discrete components and enter the blood stream intact. These intact proteins circulate throughout the body prompting inflammation in the same manner as a transplanted organ. This occurs everywhere the intact animal proteins collect; skeletal joints, organs, lymph systems, pretty much everywhere.
Chronic inflammation (cell damage) causes the cells to progressively increase their replication rate in an effort to get ahead of the damage rate until the replication rate finally exceeds control. That is called cancer.

  Attachments
 
  1. Sean Carney
  1. 5 / 5

Ken,
I love how you think things through.
Sean

  Attachments
 
  1. Deborah

I loved reading Ken's thoughtful explanation too! It is so wonderful to see some sanity! I sometimes start to feel a little crazy, when all around me, even intelligent & well educated people speak about cancer as if it is something we "catch" or "get". (heavy sigh)

  Attachments
 
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location